8
$\begingroup$

Often new members that aren't part of another SE site ask "bad" questions that reflect that they haven't even taken the trouble to Google the topic they are concerned about. An example might be this question. I think those questions shouldn't be downvoted too soon since this might discourage people who have no experience with Q&A sites from asking further (and hopefully better) questions. In my opinion they should be told what's wrong with their question first, and given some advice and time to improve it. What do you think about the matter?

$\endgroup$
9
$\begingroup$

One of the listed reasons for downvoting is "Does not show research effort" and so it should be downvoted.

However, just a downvote by itself is not going to help the OP. Post a comment saying WHY you downvoted, and if they edit the post, you can take back the downvote.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That sounds reasonable. I actually forgot that one could take back votes ;) $\endgroup$ – Philipp May 13 '12 at 19:43
  • $\begingroup$ I think the rule is you have 15 minutes to change your vote, and after that, it is locked in. However, if the question is edited (I don't think that editing tags counts) then you can change your vote. $\endgroup$ – soandos May 13 '12 at 19:45
  • $\begingroup$ I downvoted you!I think "Does not show research effort" exclude homework question so is not right to use this criteria...I think in this period we should only use comments for question and eventually use downvote for anwers.. $\endgroup$ – G M Apr 1 '14 at 17:40
9
$\begingroup$

We are about posts, not users. Posts should be upvoted solely on the basis of their merit and not on the basis of the user who wrote them--there even is a large school of thought that rep should be hidden away on posts.

That being said, I am a bit lax on downvoting newbies--in the sense that I comment first, downvote later in borderline cases. But that's all.

(Shameless self plug): You may want to see the voting faq

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

Personally I think that down vote is not necessary for the moment, downvote is useful when we have a lot of questions and we need to focus the attention in the most useful. But we don't have a lot of questions!

It is normal for users coming from other Q&A sites (e.g. Yahoo answer) to post these sort of questions so be downvoted is very annoying for new user that most of the times don't understand why. Comment is much more constructive.

I strongly discourage downvote on newbie questions! Newbie are potentially good future users. When students ask a silly questions to the professor, I don't think is right that the professor punish them, these is the right method to discourage good questions too. I will use downvote only for spam questions and in some cases for wrong answers.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I think we should copy TeX.SX's policy of never downvoting a question under -1. That shows the user that they've screwed up, without unfairly punishing them. It is also then easier for them to have the question upvoted if they improve it (Which I have seen happen once feedback is given)

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note that downvotes of -3 make the question disappear from the main page, and IMO more downvotes means that more people don't like it--a rather valuable metric. If the post is fixed, even a single upvote will recompensate for the rep lost. $\endgroup$ – ManishEarth May 15 '12 at 5:38
  • $\begingroup$ Well, never downvote below -3 then; I've seen questions downvoted to -15 before, which is rather pointless. $\endgroup$ – Canageek May 17 '12 at 2:14
  • $\begingroup$ where? On MSO? MSO has a completely different meaning for votes.. $\endgroup$ – ManishEarth May 17 '12 at 2:49
  • $\begingroup$ Gaming.SX as I recall, it has been a while. $\endgroup$ – Canageek May 17 '12 at 2:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .