7
$\begingroup$

While going though the new tags, I spotted, that the was created, which eventually brought me back to the endeavour of tagging functional groups in general. (Should we create tags for common functional groups?)

While I was editing a couple of questions, to include , I noticed that MathJax is not rendered in the pop-up. (I am very sorry for not adding hand drawn circles here.)

screen shot edit tags

On the Wiki page itself everything works as expected.

screen shot tag wiki page

I would still think that it is a good thing to exclude MathJax from the Tag Wiki excerpts.
What is your opinion?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If it is not supported in the pop-up, I think it is best to don't use it. $\endgroup$ Aug 13 '15 at 10:11
  • $\begingroup$ This ancient weird quasi-cool font we got here already suppresses numbers. It's ideal not to use MathJax, and even if we don't, we don't run into much trouble. $\endgroup$
    – M.A.R.
    Aug 13 '15 at 19:17
  • $\begingroup$ I'd say there's a bug here: I'm just not sure whether the bug is that MathJax doesn't work in the pop-ups, or that it does work for the excerpt on the tag wiki page. Either way, it should be consistent. $\endgroup$ Aug 17 '15 at 9:48
6
$\begingroup$

I agree that it should be removed. I was the one who created the nitro-compounds tag and the wiki to go with it. I wasn't aware that MathJax didn't render in the excerpt popup but if I was then I wouldn't have used it. It doesn't seem essential to convey the meaning; it just makes it look a bit nicer.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .