4
$\begingroup$

has no tag wiki and seems like a pretty useless tag to me. Any thoughts? Does it have a scope or should it be deleted?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I tried to kill it silently but failed, it has to be done by hand. $\endgroup$ Sep 26 '15 at 20:35
4
$\begingroup$

is not a role of tags. Not a good tag to preserve.

If my hunch is correct, model is supposed to be for questions about $\ldots$ models. But since almost everything in chemistry is explained by some sort of model we have to tag every question with .

BTW I'm kidding. The applicability of the tag to everything means it's either a "meta" tag or needs to be closed as "too broad". It seems no one thought this could be a tag so we didn't get enough tagging to notice it, but it seems it was a tag introduced in the early days of beta when stuff weren't that $\ldots$ consistent.

15 questions are a harmless retag, but if we're feeling lazy, I can add it to the TRE checklist.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oh BTW the syntax **[tag:foo]** looks cool. $\endgroup$
    – M.A.R.
    Sep 26 '15 at 19:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .