Just came across this question on the main page, and noticed that we haven't specifically been paying attention to on the site.

I'm concerned that we may be overlooking a major maintenance problem. On a quick look around, I found one hundred fifty-nine spots of .

Should we mark these somehow, so that we can find them more easily?

  • $\begingroup$ 160 now, although hardly the best question... I think it's not a bad idea. If you could write up a tag wiki too, that would be great. If somebody knowledgeable enough to write a proper wiki is on the job, that seems (to me) to be a good indicator that the tag is reasonable to have. $\endgroup$ – orthocresol Mar 26 '17 at 20:53
  • $\begingroup$ @orthocresol I'll gladly take on the tag wiki. Should I give it a couple more days, to give more of the community a chance to see it and weigh in? $\endgroup$ – hBy2Py Mar 26 '17 at 20:55
  • $\begingroup$ Yup, sure! Site seems to be moving slightly slowly these few days. Take your time. $\endgroup$ – orthocresol Mar 26 '17 at 21:29

I don't see anything wrong with creating this tag as it seems to already have the critical mass to be used appropriately. I also think that the MATT is good for this one (I got 18).

Moreover it will give us a chance to review the questions and maybe sort out a few not so good ones. While editing, keep in mind not to flush the homepage with 150 odd questions at once.

It would be very much appreciated, that you write a tag usage and a short entry into the wiki, if you choose to create the tag.

  • $\begingroup$ Oh yeah, I'd do a search for untagged, related questions (maybe put together a SEDE query, if needed -- am hooked now) and go through maybe 10-15 questions a day, 9-11pm EDT (2-4amUTC, I think?). $\endgroup$ – hBy2Py Mar 27 '17 at 14:40
  • $\begingroup$ @hBy2Py maybe add it to the github project? $\endgroup$ – heather Apr 1 '17 at 19:24
  • $\begingroup$ @heather <nod>, once I get the tag wiki and excerpt drafted, I'll figure out a good search breakdown and create a Project for it. Focus for now remains [reaction]. $\endgroup$ – hBy2Py Apr 1 '17 at 20:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .