-3
$\begingroup$

This question was closed as "Not focused". I have since then edited and simplified. Asking only one aspect now.

Is this now fit to be opened?

$\endgroup$
0

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

I don't really know about this; I think it is actually okay... The original question about whether O2 or O3 is more stable was an obvious reason for the closure, but since that's been edited out, I don't see the issue.

I think with some cleaning up of grammar etc. for clarity, this could definitely be reopened.

[One might argue that we should look over problems with grammar etc., but I think the bottom line is that if you make your question look more professional, it will be received better.]

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ That's why I voted to reopen it. I don't know why I retracted it. $\endgroup$ Feb 15, 2022 at 4:26
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot. I appreciate that writing should be more professional. And also not confusing with multiple questions. $\endgroup$ Feb 17, 2022 at 6:24
1
$\begingroup$

I didn't vote to close but I agree with the action.

Your new "edited and simplified" version contains 4 question marks.

Forgiving sins relating to grammar and punctuation, the query "[o]r any other reason?" alone still does not address the issue.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .