Timeline for Merge "lewis-structure" and "structural-formula"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2015 at 10:12 | vote | accept | M.A.R. | ||
| Oct 20, 2015 at 4:19 | comment | added | Martin - マーチン Mod | @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M I am not the one that needs to be convinced here. The community needs to be convinced. And if I say, we wait and see for at least a week, I mean waiting for more than seven days. I do not like rushing things that may come around and bite me in the behind. Ideally the consensus finding process takes about a month, so even a week feels very rushed. Just be patient, we will work it out. | |
| Oct 19, 2015 at 21:25 | comment | added | M.A.R. | @Jan they are, because they generate unnecessary work. | |
| Oct 19, 2015 at 21:24 | comment | added | Jan | See discussion here @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M. Broad and subset tags are not a bad thing ;) | |
| Oct 19, 2015 at 20:53 | history | edited | user7951 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Sägebock is not a proper name
|
| Oct 19, 2015 at 20:50 | comment | added | user7951 | BTW, according to IUPAC recommendations 2008: “Although that convention is useful for teaching introductory chemistry, the use of Lewis structures outside of educational situations is strongly discouraged.” | |
| Oct 19, 2015 at 20:41 | comment | added | M.A.R. | So the situation boils down to this: Every question tagged with "Lewis structure" can have "structural formula" as its other tag because LS are SF's as well, so we were introducing a redundant tag. However, removing it wouldn't have worked, since we have questions regarding Fischer projections and stuff. Now, with the introduction of the other tag, we would be able to deal with this problem. Let's get the German mod to agree and we're good to go. | |
| Oct 19, 2015 at 20:38 | comment | added | Jan | @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Now how on Earth did I get frank as a name =O | |
| Oct 19, 2015 at 20:35 | comment | added | M.A.R. | Thanks Frank. I love your other suggestion: Adding a "stereochemical projection". | |
| Oct 19, 2015 at 20:33 | history | answered | Jan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |