Timeline for Should we merge the stereochemistry and stereoisomerism tags?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.chemistry.stackexchange.com/ with https://chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 17, 2015 at 4:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackChemistry/status/611020692155432960 | ||
| Jun 16, 2015 at 20:50 | comment | added | ManishEarth Mod | Done; since there already seemed to be agreement on the old thread and there are votes here too. | |
| Jun 16, 2015 at 20:50 | history | edited | ManishEarthMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 16, 2015 at 20:07 | comment | added | Geoff Hutchison | I would certainly vote for making stereoisomerism a synonym for stereochemistry, which seems the more common concept. | |
| Jun 16, 2015 at 19:56 | comment | added | Wildcat | Yes, they look redundant, since stereochemistry is a branch of chemistry which studies stereoisomers. | |
| Jun 16, 2015 at 19:35 | history | asked | bon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |