Timeline for Is ChemiDay a reliable enough source (for inorganic reactions) to be cited on our site?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2023 at 5:50 | answer | added | Nilay Ghosh | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 10, 2020 at 14:02 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Dec 22, 2019 at 23:35 | history | edited | Martin - マーチンMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 10, 2019 at 5:36 | history | edited | andseliskMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor punctuation improvements and formatted quoted part as one
|
| Jun 17, 2018 at 3:18 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/1008187028725477376 | ||
| Jun 11, 2018 at 8:25 | comment | added | orthocresol Mod | @hBy2Py apparently, it’s “better source needed”, which makes a bit more sense: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Better_source | |
| Jun 9, 2018 at 16:55 | vote | accept | Gaurang Tandon | ||
| Jun 7, 2018 at 13:58 | answer | added | hBy2Py | timeline score: 19 | |
| Jun 7, 2018 at 13:58 | comment | added | hBy2Py | @orthocresol Definitely $^\text{[citation needed]}$; not sure about $^\text{[better citation needed]}$. | |
| Jun 7, 2018 at 11:47 | comment | added | orthocresol Mod | Wikipedia has a “better citation needed” for this kind of thing, IIRC. | |
| Jun 7, 2018 at 6:27 | history | asked | Gaurang Tandon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |